I hate when replies to posts are written point by point, but Randy has so many inaccuracies in his post, that I don't know where to begin otherwise.
Randy says:
"Why does the vindicator publish more articles about Charter school than the failing public schools?"
Yet, the Vindicator never published any story about the failures of Charter Schools. They are very protective of the local charter schools for unknown reasons. The people who post on these discussion boards are not on the staff of the Vindicator. We post entries from the other newspapers in Ohio, because they HAVE revealed the problems with Charter Schools, unlike the Vindicator.
Randy says:
"Also knowing that charter schools now educate children for less than half of the cost of public or government schools why doesn’t the Vindy look at where the other half of charter school money is being spent in the public sector?"
But the state gives charter schools more funding than public schools. The state creates a fund for each district based on the number of students and the relative poverty or affluence of the district. Youngstown usually receives about $4,000 per pupil, but the state removes $5,300 or more for each student that leaves to attend a charter school. Boardman Schools receive about $1,200 from the state, but the state removes $5,300 for students who leave for a charter school. The state gives charter schools much more tuition (all deducted from the funds schools use to operate) for special education students, so many students are identified as needing special education after enrolling in a charter school. In addition, the state forces the public school to pay for all the transportation of charter school students. In addition, charter schools receive money from federal grants and contributions from the gullible. In short, they do not do the job for less.
Randy says:
"Dayton Public Schools recently spent $750,000.00 for an ad campaign to persuade parents to keep their children in public schools." but fails to add that this campaign was a desperate self-defense to the deluge of advertising the city was experiencing from charter schools. The story is easy to check out on the internet. Here in Youngstown, folks on the West side and in Austintown can tell about the elaborate brochures from Heritage Academies sent to homes. Meanwhile those on Belmont and Glenwood, and I'm sure other thoroughfares, have surely seen the billboards from the same company. The corporation joins Colt 45, cigarettes, etc. in believing this is the best advertising in poorer areas.
Randy says "OEA and NEA as they have big money behind them." HA, HA, HA, HA, HA! gasp HA! HA! HA HA HA HA whew ... Yeah right. Mosaica, the chain that runs Youngstown Academy of Excellence has revenues in the hundreds of millions of dollars, as does National Heritage Academies, the chain that runs Stambaugh Academy. David Brennan, the millionare who owns White Hat, the firm that runs Life Skills Centers and manages Eagle Heights Academy, is actually famous for owning legislators in Ohio. There are even bigger EMOs (Education Management Companies) like Edison in other states, waiting for their chance to get a foothold in Ohio. All of these organizations are well funded with grants from private "foundations" that seek to promote free market propaganda; and who believe that the building of wealth for their contributors is the most important value. Yeah these guys always like to paint the teachers as some great rich conspirators. Since I know the teachers,

this always provides a guffaw for me.
Randy says the public schools are broken and that they don't do their jobs. But except for someone like him continually telling us something is wrong, most of us are satisfied with our own education, and the schools our children attend. I personally owe everything I have accomplished, and my livelihood to the traditional schools I attended. I have to admit that when there were areas I did not do well in, it was 100% because of my own ignorance, laziness, or lack of interest in the subject -- not the teachers' fault. Despite the "failure" of public schools, they have thousands, millions of successful graduates.
The only public schools that have any issues with achievement at all, as Randy indicates, are the ones in urban areas, where the needs of so many poor children in one school can be overwhelming. Public schools in these areas have worked to equalize the odds against children in these areas for a hundred years, with dedication and honor. (and they didn't even need the motivation of profit for a rich owner, who shares the treasure with his politician friends)
But Randy, I'm glad you came to the message boards. The reason there is little good news about charter schools here is that few people have said anything good about them. Is there, in your opinion, something bad about Dann's insistence on results and financial responsibility from the charter schools? Would you like to defend either on the part of Youngstown Academy of Excellence? One would think that the giant Mosaica could afford to provide them a bookkeeper. And tell me please, how is it more cost effective for Youngstown to have 30 different schools, often with duplication of administrators, etc. when they could have the 17 public schools only, like Poland and Canfield?