Re: Poland forest board weighs change for dogs in woods
Posted by: BrothaLove (IP Logged)
Date: November 12, 2007 12:25PM
Closedshop you cannot be serious with that analogy.
It is illegal for someone to whip out a gun and begin shooting people, yes, but people are held to a higher standard of reasoning than a dog or other household pet. If a person shoots another it is a given that this person understood the laws of society and chose to ignore said laws. We do not know why a dog that is normally calm will choose to attack a person. We cannot say that the dog understands what is posted at the entrance to the park and often the animal reacts to quickly for the owner to stop it.
To avoid all that it is not asking too much for you to keep your mangy dog on a leash.
You are right it is not reasonable to want everyone to clear the streets so I can use the sidewalk, but it is reasonable to expect a certain level security while I use the streets and that security is compromised when a loose dog, that by nature of it being an animal is unpredictable, is running around loose.
You want your dog to run loose then by a fence or one of those collars that keeps the animal on your property, but don't compromise my right to use public areas. The last time I checked I pay taxes your dog doesn't.
signed
BrothaLove